|
|
jhodges Commentary
Posted 7/23/12
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commentary: The Penn State Saga and Lessons for Northwestern
by Jonathan Hodges
The
situation involving Jerry Sandusky's child abuse and subsequent
cover-up by Penn State administrators seems to be coming to a quick
conclusion after Sandusky was found guilty, Louis Freeh's
PSU-commissioned report on PSU involvement was issued, and both the
NCAA and Big Ten came down with tough sanctions against the football
program. This article will not rehash the events leading to the
situation or the aftermath, but instead will focus on the broader
picture and what it means for other college football programs,
particularly Northwestern.
It Could Happen Anywhere
First
off, to those in the Northwestern community who say "it can't happen
here," the fact is that it happened at a school where most would have
said the same thing before November 5, 2011, and most other college
football fans across the nation would agree. PSU was home of the "grand
experiment" by Coach Joe Paterno, which included fielding a successful
football team that also lived by high ideals off the field, including a
clear objective to graduate its football players (something that was
and is not necessarily a priority at other "football factories").
Paterno
was considered to be an upright and moral man (see his multimillion
donation to the PSU library amongst other things) and his longevity as
a football coach and success in that field were second-to-none. In his
46 year tenure as head coach, his winning rate was 0.749 and included
five undefeated seasons and two national titles. Penn State grew in
size and stature and became a national power both on the field and in
the classroom; the institution was admitted into the Big Ten conference
in the early 1990's and joined the prestigious AAU on the academic
side. Unfortunately all of that eventually granted Paterno entirely too
much power over not just the football program, but the school as a
whole.
This
led to a situation where the chain of command essentially ran through
Joe Paterno, even though he was theoretically employed by the athletic
director, with the athletic director reporting to the school president
being accountable to the board of trustees. Instead, the AD and
President were beholden to Paterno, exemplified in the early 2000's
when they came to Paterno with a request for him to retire that he
handily dismissed. There have also been accusations of Paterno
circumventing the discipline process involving off-field behavior of
his players. Finally, and most importantly, this led to the cover-up of
the Sandusky accusations from as far back as 1998 which allowed crimes
against children to continue for over a decade.
Note
that even Sandusky himself was revered in the community, particularly
given his position in the Second Mile children's charity. Unfortunately
that ended up being a crooked front to his criminal activities.
Nothing
close to this has ever happened at Northwestern, but the seeds are
certainly there. Pat Fitzgerald is highly regarded in the Northwestern
community and around the nation for what his team does both on and off
the field. He holds a high place in NU football history for what he did
on the field in the mid-1990's renaissance of the program and also for
fielding a competitive team as a coach that includes a program-record
active four game bowl streak. NU also holds itself to extremely strict
academic standards as well as rules for off-field behavior and an
expectation of community service.
All
of this plus the expectation from the Northwestern community that the
school and football program do things the "right way" and that puts NU
in a very similar situation that PSU was in, which was certainly a
factor in the decision to cover-up that situation. While Fitz doesn't
have nearly the same level of unofficial authority that Paterno had
after decades on the job, one could certainly envision Fitz making that
ascent if he brings further success (particularly Big Ten
championships) to the 'Cats during what should be a career that spans a
double-digit number of years.
Finally,
Northwestern is not without blemishes: there was the infamous Dennis
Lundy point shaving scandal of the early 1990's, there have been
off-field incidents over the years, and, worst of all, there was the
death of Rashidi Wheeler during a preseason conditioning drill in 2001. In all
cases NU responded and did so in a relatively open matter, but if the
program were in the middle of a successful run where they were
competing for conference championships, would they do the same thing?
The temptation of a cover-up is certainly there and the cover-up is
what this whole quandary is about.
Northwestern's Past
One
major obstacle in a similar incident occurring at Northwestern is its
own past: the Dark Ages. After 1971's 7-4 season, the Wildcats went 24
years until another winning campaign, and that span included the
infamous 34 game losing streak ("The Streak") during which NU became
the laughing stock of the conference, and possibly even major college
football. Northwestern's administration, led by then-president Bob
Strotz, certainly brought this on themselves by de-emphasizing
athletics. They did this most directly by essentially underfunding the
program, especially relative to its Big Ten competition.
Before
that, NU fielded a mostly competitive program that, while not as
successful as the top tier Big Ten programs (Ohio State and Michigan),
they found success from time to time and would have gained more
recognition if not for the bowl restrictions at the time that did not
allow the Big Ten to have more than one team in a bowl game (the Rose
Bowl). But the aforementioned underfunding played a big role in putting
an end to that relative success: Ara Parseghian was allowed to leave to
coach at Notre Dame, and his successor, Alex Agase, was allowed to head
to coach at Purdue; both led NU to multiple winning seasons.
While
academic restrictions along with funding constraints due to the
school's size and private nature have and will likely always be in
place at Northwestern, it was clear that the NU administration made a
conscious decision to prevent on-field success by keeping resources
away from the football program.
Eventually,
this mindset began to subside when NU started getting small tastes of
success (Dennis Green's teams ended The Streak and won 3 games one
season during which he won Coach of the Year for the conference,
although he too would leave the program) which eventually led to the
hiring of Gary Barnett. Barnett, of course, turned around the program
and that has led to sustained support from the community as well as the
administration (who were essentially newcomers). This has, in turn, led
to a sustained competitiveness on the field (nine bowl berths and three
conference titles) since the turnaround in 1995.
But
the impact of the Dark Ages lingers, most notably in the attitude of
the Northwestern community. The vast majority of NU students and alumni
prioritize academics and do not believe in a "win at any cost" culture.
The Dark Ages taught members of the NU community who were around during
that time what the priorities were, and while some of the on-field
results still haunt the program (The Streak), it certainly serves as a
reminder to the priorities of the school. Although NU will no longer
starve its athletic programs of funds in order to stave off success,
the end priority of academics will remain in its pole position.
Conclusion
Although
not a problem now, the potential is always there for winning football
games to be such a high priority that transgressions are allowed to
occur and are subsequently covered-up. Northwestern has never been a
football powerhouse, but the seeds are certainly there to allow a
successful football program to overtake other priorities, and NU must
be vigilant to prevent that from happening. If there is one benefit of
the Dark Ages, it is that the NU community generally has a good
perspective and has its priorities in order regarding academics versus
athletics and the true intention of higher learning.
The
NCAA certainly hopes that the punishment sends a message out to all
schools that crimes and violations are not be be allowed to occur
and/or covered-up to preserve a football program. This is certainly a
strong message, although I continue to believe that the only way to
truly change priorities on a national level is for the NFL to start its own minor league.
Considering that is extremely unlikely, though, if schools maintain a
proper chain of authority: coach to AD to president to board to
community, and clearly prioritize academics over athletics (which I believe NU continues to do
and I wholeheartedly agree with), then the most egregious situations,
like this, can be prevented. Finally, no school is perfect and the best
thing that a school can do is to follow the chain of accountability and
admit transgressions followed by changes to help prevent future
recurrences.
Go 'Cats!!!
e-mail: j-hodges@alumni.northwestern.edu
Previous jhodges commentary
jhodges
is the primary content provider of HailToPurple.com. His commentary
and game analyses appear regularly during the season and occasionally
in the offseason.
|
|
|