|
|
jhodges Commentary
Posted 10/22/11
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commentary: The Only Way to Fix College Football
by Jonathan Hodges
You have likely heard of the Yahoo! Sports report detailing a number (72, to be exact) of
University of Miami (FL) athletes alleged to have received benefits in violation
of NCAA rules from a Miami booster (who now happens to be in prison thanks to
his dealings in a $900M+ Ponzi scheme). And this was in addition to high
profile rules violations earlier this year from the likes of Ohio State and
North Carolina, plus new allegations out of Oregon. All of this has, of course,
led to rampant speculation and opinion on how the NCAA should or should not try
to address the continued downward trend of morality in college football at
large. The fact is that there is no way to marry the vision of what amateur
collegiate football should be with reality; we'll explore the reasons behind
this as well as the only logical way to "fix" college
football.
The Vision of Amateurism
The vision springs
from the fact that collegiate athletics truly did begin as extra-curricular
activities; football in particular began in the late 19th century at various
prestigious institutions around the country, and until the turn of the century
typically featured student managers and bouts versus just about any local
organization (including high schools and professional schools). Both of the key
collegiate revenue sports (football and men's basketball) grew in popularity
primarily in the college realm and only later would the respective professional
leagues experience a boom in popularity (more on that later).
Although
the exact rules have varied over time (and have resulted in a current NCAA
rulebook that all agree is unsustainably large), the basic premise has been that
collegiate athletes are still primarily students and cannot receive any benefits
beyond a scholarship to attend the school. Over time, schools began to
differentiate themselves over the quantity and even the decision to offer such
scholarships, leading to multiple divisions of the NCAA and segments such as the
Ivy League and all of Division III that do not offer athletic scholarships.
Even back in the first half of the 20th century while these decisions were being
made (e.g. the University of Chicago's decision to drop out of the Big Ten and
not offer athletic scholarships in the 1940s), amateurism was being questioned
and the staunchly academic schools were opting out of the troublesome system.
Needless to say, things have become far worse.
Over the last half century
or so, the business of college football has boomed: stadiums have expanded to
hold over 100,000, teams are pulling in revenue via all kinds of mechanisms
(memorabilia licensing, websites, booster clubs), and monstrous television
rights deals have been born (leading to tens of millions of dollars funneling
into the bigtime programs every year). The postseason bowl system has expanded
from a handful of games to 35 (with the accompanying huge increase in revenue).
And the media has lapped up everything that the college game has dished out:
from the advent of the national polls in the 30s, 40s, and 50s, games on TV in
the 50s and 60s, magazines and newsletters in the 70s and 80s to online
recruiting sites, message boards, cable networks, and highly trafficked websites
in the 90s and today. College football is bigger, more prominent, and brings in
more revenue than ever.
Fans have obviously loved the changes (hence the
boom in revenue) including the ability to watch and consume college football in
many different ways (radio, TV, web, print) and for 24 hours a day and 365.25
days a year. The quality of play is certainly up. Universities receive a ton
of publicity and use the revenue received to fund scholarships and numerous
other sports programs. Many young people get to experience a free education
thanks to the scholarship system: many who may not have been able to attend
and/or pay for college otherwise (and that includes women as well, thanks to
Title IX scholarship equity requirements). In the majority of cases, college
football provides a positive experience and teaches many lessons on and off the
field that can be used later in life. Between the athletes, fans, and
universities, there is a large upside to the booming business of college
football. Unfortunately, that aforementioned dark side has also
grown.
The Downside
Competitiveness is inherent in
human nature, and anything a person and/or organization can do to get ahead is
always considered, whether ethical or not. Since almost the very beginning of
football, this has come into play: in the early 1900s football was almost banned
nationally due to the increasingly violent nature of the game; only an increased
set of rules and the advent of the forward pass saved the game. And off the
field, things have most certainly gone out of control.
Part of that is
due to the structure of the NCAA: a group formed and controlled by its
membership, the universities, represented by the presidents and chancellors of
those institutions. It is not a government entity and does not have any kind of
overarching power except those specifically granted by its members. It has
relatively little power, and making many decisions and/or changes to the
structure required one to essentially move mountains by getting hundreds of
member institutions to agree on the changes. And the staff of the organization
charged with overseeing hundreds of schools is just way too small to effectively
enforce; in fact, compliance is up to the schools themselves with the NCAA only
coming into play once a school self-reports or if something is reported through
other entities with corroborating evidence. This is the organization that must
fight against human nature itself.
In order to get ahead, some
individuals and groups have done all kinds of things to support their beloved
schools, with a lot of violations coming in the area of recruiting: to get the
best athletes to attend their school. And once at the school, that means
following through with improper gifts and benefits, which we can't even begin to
number (although see the Miami article linked above for some examples). The
fact is that fans (and, sometimes, university-affiliated parties) desperately
want their teams to win and an effective way of working towards that is to flirt
with, and sometimes go way beyond, the amateurism rules.
This has turned
the college game into what many consider a cesspool, a constant barrage of
violations coming from virtually everywhere (the vast majority of schools have
had major violations and the number of secondary violations numbers in the
hundreds each season). The majority of schools still try to do things the
"right way" and abide by the rules as best they can, but the violators certainly
spoil things for everyone involved, whether they are caught or not. Overall,
college athletics benefits a lot of people and helps bring together school
communities across the nation, but the black marks have accumulated to the
current state of dominating the national scene.
The fact is that the
current path seems unsustainable: the money for the schools and coaches keeps
spiraling upwards, the violations keep piling up, and, meanwhile, the
student-athletes are seemingly left behind with many being left out in the cold
due to injuries, broken promises, and a system that is stacked against them.
Virtually everyone agrees something must be done, including the NCAA itself
which stated that it wanted to completely revamp the rulebook; but, it seems
that something even more drastic must be done to address the root of the
problem.
The Solution
The only reasonable solution is
to force the NFL to form its own minor league system and remove the artificial
requirement that players be three years out of high school before entering
professional football.
The fact is that the NFL has used the NCAA as a de
facto minor league ever since it was formed and essentially cemented that with
its current rules on age of its players. The NCAA has certainly benefited from
this arrangement, helping to put some truly great athletes on the field over the
years which has increased the caliber of play, especially in the highest level
of competition (e.g. BCS automatic qualifying conferences). This has
essentially led to the NCAA cooperating with the NFL on many levels to
synchronize their systems with each other even if they don't have overt (and
likely illegal on an anti-trust basis) arrangements.
The NCAA itself or
another group (like the Playoff PAC or other groups currently trying to take
down the BCS) and the media could certainly work towards this goal, and if the
school presidents ever fully awake, they could certainly turn the NCAA on these
matters. If they work towards breaking these artificial rules, it could
ultimately bring about this type of seismic change.
Now, what would this
mean for college football? Certainly the caliber of play would suffer to some
degree with the top athletes obviously forgoing college to go to the NFL minor
leagues. But some star players would remain (see the baseball system) and I
believe that ratings and attention would not suffer all that much: most fans
would not want to watch the NFL minor leagues which would be filled with either
developmental players or borderline NFL players and would feature a bunch of
guys learning typically-boring NFL systems. Meanwhile, the college game would
still get everyone's attention on Saturdays as legions of fans and alumni would
not suddenly quit on the game with a few star players absent from the field.
Did the XFL or does the UFL detract from college football?
What this
would allow is NCAA football to focus more on the student portion of
student-athlete and worry less about the recruiting race as those top athletes
would be moving on to a place where they have market value. Make the recruiting
process more transparent, loosen some of the crazy restrictions (e.g. no text
messaging), allow early signing periods, and make the National Letter of Intent
process more fair (holding the schools to some requirements, like multi-year
scholarships). Put everyone on more equal ground and end some of the crazy
loopholes like oversigning and grayshirting. Get college football back to its
true intent: to bring university communities together and to help develop
well-rounded student athletes (not running minor league NFL teams solely focused
on bringing in football talent, winning at any cost, and sending them on to the
next level).
Will this ever happen? Unlikely, as the NFL is perfectly
content with the current system (a free minor league system!) while the NCAA is
in no place to want to change given the upward-spiraling money in the form of TV
deals and bowl games. But, at some point, all of the negativity will come to a
head and something will have to change. Nothing will be a perfect solution, but
starting an NFL minor league system would help remove much of the hypocrisy in
college football today and change the current downward trajectory of ethics in
the college game.
e-mail: j-hodges@alumni.northwestern.edu
Previous jhodges commentary
jhodges
is the primary content provider of HailToPurple.com. His commentary
and game analyses appear regularly during the season and occasionally
in the offseason.
|
|
|