|
|
jhodges Commentary
Posted 10/14/08
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commentary: Mid-Season Report Card 2008
by Jonathan Hodges
Overall
At 5-1 with a 1-1 Big Ten record, the 'Cats have met most
expectations at the halfway point of the 2008 season, and while the final game
(the loss to Michigan State) was a disappointment, one can't be too dissatisfied
with a 5-1 record. Northwestern has made a lot of progress in key aspects of
the game - particularly defense, where NU's scoring defense (16.5 ppg) ranks
23rd nationally, and its 3.17 sacks/game is 7th in the country and 7.5 TFLs/game
ranks 15th. As a total, NU has now surpassed its sack total from last year just
half way through this season - which has translated directly into results on the
scoreboard. Most followers of the Wildcats knew that with the talent and
experience on defense coupled with new DC Hankwitz, the D would be improved, but
I doubt any would have predicted a squad that put up this good of numbers, no
matter what the competition. And the success on defense has translated into
wins, with big late game defensive stands against Duke, Ohio, and Iowa all
translating into wins.
On the other side of the ball, the offense has
looked okay, but that's about it. The offense has shown little big-play
potential, instead forced to go on long, methodical drives that are effective,
but also constrain the 'Cats' point production. With a senior-laden squad of
skill players who have shown a good amount of talent over their years, this
offense has underwhelmed so far. In fact, the biggest question mark of this
year was the offensive line - and they are doing quite well for themselves,
ranking 4th nationally allowing only 0.5 sacks/game and blocking for a team that
is averaging 4.5 yards/carry in the running game. One also can't blame Tyrell
Sutton, who is having a solid senior year, with 603 rushing yards (5.5 ypc) and
5 TDs along with 200 receiving yards (on 24 receptions) and 1 TD. Meanwhile, CJ
Bacher hasn't put up as big of numbers as he did a year ago (albeit the NU
offense is more balanced with the run game this year), and hasn't been able to
get over the interception bug. His numbers are 138 for 236 passing (58%) for
1325 yards (221 yards/game), 8 INTs, and 7 TDs; he has added 139 yards rushing
and 1 TD (36 attempts) and one catch for 25 yards. Although 4 of his INTs came
in one game that NU won (Ohio), the interceptions scattered over the rest of the
games have hurt NU - especially in the most recent game against the Spartans.
The last piece of the puzzle, the receivers, had issues earlier in the year
(many drops against Duke), but Peterman (23 catches for 269 yards, 2 TDs), Lane
(28 catches for 332 yards), and Ward (29 catches for 278 yards, 2 TDs) have
risen to the top of the receptions list. Sutton has also provided a viable
receiving threat out of the backfield or when he's been split wide, as NU has
done on many occasions this season. Again, while this unit has done a
reasonable job, they haven't lived up to high expectations (realistic or not),
and interceptions have led to close wins or even losses.
First Half
MVP: Defensive Line. It's hard to pick out an individual with so
many key contributors, but this unit ranks near the top nationally in both sacks
and TFLs after ranking near the bottom in both categories last year. This unit
has experienced and talented players everyone knew were capable of playing so
well, but they were just never able to put it all together in recent years -
which makes the turnaround under DC Hankwitz even better. Wootton, Browne, and
Gill all have 2 or more sacks, and they have contributed in more ways adding
some blocked kicks against Ohio and forcing fumbles and recovering fumbles. The
increase in pressure up front has directly led to success of the entire
defensive unit as the secondary doesn't have to cover receivers in the open
field for as long and the running game can be slowed down, or even stopped (see
the game against Ohio where they were held to 4 net rushing yards on the
day).
Game of the First Half: Northwestern 22 - Iowa 17.
While there were other close games (e.g. Duke, Ohio), this game really set the
tone for Northwestern as they fought back from a 17-3 defecit just before
halftime to earn the win as the defense stonewalled the Hawkeyes in the second
half, most notably forcing 4 incompletions after Iowa had first and goal with
just over a minute to play and the chance to win themselves. Any Big Ten road
win is huge, especially one at Kinnick, and this game put NU on the map
nationally after quitely winning all of its nonconference games for the first
time since 1963 and racking up its best start to a season since 1962. The
defense showed that its improvement was real and used turnovers to make the
difference in the game.
Surprise of the First Half: Offensive
Line. Who would have thought before the season that this unit would allow
so few sacks this season, especially after the experience-laden unit last year
broke down on numerous occasions? This is a line that has featured 3 redshirt
freshmen and a converted DL starting, while its most experienced starters have
either been passed on the 2-deep or were constrained with injury. And it has,
as mentioned earlier, only allowed an average of 0.5 sacks/game (near the very
top nationally) and has blocked reasonably well, allowing NU to gain 4.5
yards/carry. C Burkett has shown the most poise, going up against some tough
DTs yet still excelling as a first time starter at this level; he has also
seemingly corrected those high snaps on running plays during the bye week. On
the left side, Netter and Kennedy have been up to the task, sealing off CJ's
blind side consistently during the first half of the season. And on the right,
Bartels has emerged as a redshirt freshman to take away senior (and the most
experienced lineman coming into the year) Belding's starting role, while Taylor
has really emerged as a key cog of the OL at RT. Mattes has been solid in
limited duty, although a knee injury kept him out for much of the first half
(although he has recovered enough to get onto the field in the most recent game
against MSU). For a unit that was the biggest question mark coming into the
year and replacing an experienced line that seemingly collapsed at times in 2007
(especially in the second halves of games), this unit has been outstanding and
has gone far beyond expectations before the season
began.
Disappointment of the First Half: The Offense. With
a ton of talent returning at the skill positions (Bacher, Sutton, Conteh,
Peterman, Lane, Ward) the only question was how the OL would hold up with so
many new starters - and as noted above, the OL performed very well. Given that
and the fact that the offense put up gaudy numbers last year (at least on some
occasions), one expected this year's offense to really get things rolling,
especially against lesser competition earlier in the year. But, in at least 3
games, it was the defense that won the game for NU (Duke, Ohio, and Iowa), and
one could even argue that the Syracuse win was also thanks to the defense (who
almost outscored Syracuse themselves, putting a return TD and a safety on the
board). Meanwhile, the offense struggled to both move the ball down the field
and convert red zone trips to TDs: against Ohio, NU had 4 trips to the red zone
and came away with 3 FGs and a TD and found themselves in a one-score ballgame
late; and against Iowa NU found themselves with the ball deep in Iowa territory
twice (thanks to turnovers) but came up empty - fortunately, the offense found
their groove later in the game to drive down the field for the go-ahead TD. One
may place the blame on new OC McCall, who seems to have the offense "thinking
too much" out there, or on the offensive line's run blocking (which hasn't been
great despite their excellent pass blocking), or the receivers who dropped a
plethora of balls early on (especially against Duke), or even on Bacher, who
hasn't shown much improvement over last season - especially during the Ohio game
where he had 4 INTs. Against MSU, it was turnovers (including 2 INTs) that
sealed the loss, and although the offense put up a lot of yards in a comeback
attempt, they never got enough big plays to try and close the gap quicker
(Sutton provided the only fireworks on the day, ripping off a 66 yard run in the
3rd period). Overall, though, this unit hasn't moved the ball as well as it
should given its experience, talent, and track record, and their red zone TD
conversion rate also leaves some to be desired when they do make it down the
field. The one good thing is that they have put enough points on the board to
win football games, which is what matters at the end of the day; and they still
have the opportunity to turn things around, albeit against some tough Big Ten
defenses.
Impact Underclassman: C Ben Burkett.
Realistically, both LT Al Netter and RG Doug Bartels could be listed here as
well, as they are all redshirt freshmen and have emerged as starters on the OL.
The offensive line was a giant question mark going into the season and this
group helped shore up things very nicely alongside converted DL Kennedy and
Taylor, who emerged after a strong spring and summer as a starter. What is
especially interesting is that the most experienced returning offensive lineman,
Joel Belding, has been relegated to mostly backup duty on the line thanks to the
strong performance of these other players. And with RT Mattes out with a knee
injury for a good portion of the first half of the year and Taylor shifting into
the tackle position, it gave Bartels the chance to step up. Plus, the only real
issue early in the year was consistent high snaps on running plays, which
virtually disappeared against MSU as it was likely corrected during the bye
week. An outstanding job by this guy (and the whole line) which should give NU
very firm legs to stand upon for the remainder of this year and even looking
ahead to the next 3 seasons.
Unit
Grades
Offense
Grade: B- Stats
(national rank): 24.17 points/game (72nd), 379.0 yds/game (51st), 47.5%
3rd Down Conversion (20th), 153.8 rush yds/game (57th), 225.17 pass yds/game
(49th), 11 turnovers lost: 8 INT & 3 fumbles (58th), 0.5 sacks/game allowed
(4th). Overall: As mentioned
earlier, this unit has been disappointing considering high expectations,
although they have been able to move the ball reasonably well with a balanced
attack and a relatively high third down conversion rate. The OL is not allowing
anyone to get consistent pressure on CJ, and that at least allows NU to stay
even with the chains or better. The missing piece has been explosive plays to
take up big chunks of yards quickly; NU has really only gotten about one of
those big plays per game, which has forced the offense to put together long
drives down the field to get into scoring range. Some of this can be attributed
to new OC McCall's offensive system, which relies upon the short passing game
and a balanced running attack to move the ball down the field in manageable
chunks. Given the success of the defense, the offense's output has been
acceptable so far (at least in the 5 wins), but it also leaves some to be
desired and is a cause for concern leading into a stretch of games against teams
with high offensive potential (Purdue, Indiana, Minnesota, and Ohio
State).
Quarterback: B- CJ Bacher has not really progressed this
season as much as one would expect, throwing 8 INTs to 7 TDs so far this year,
although he has engineered some key drives (including go-ahead drives at both
Duke and Iowa). He still provides valuable leadership for this team, though,
and has shown much toughness not only by holding onto the ball during runs or
while being tackled, but also by persevering through some tough
situations, like coming back after a 4 INT performance to throw 3 TDs to only 1
INT at Iowa. The team voted him as one of their captains for a reason; he is a
leader on this team and no matter what mistakes he makes, he has shown that he
has the ability to come back and turn things around the following game. In
terms of on the field issues, one of his biggest issues this season has been
forcing throws when he should be tucking the ball or throwing it away. I do
give him credit for the times he has thrown the ball away, but there were
multiple instances where he has been scrambling and then threw the ball directly
into a crowd of defenders to try and make something happen. If he can limit
these mistakes, it will be a marked improvement in the second half of his senior
year.
Running Backs
and "Superbacks": B+ Credit Sutton for fighting through a
hamstring injury that kept him out of the second half against Ohio (which
definitely showed as the offense sputtered as NU relied on its defense to seal
the win), as he's averaging just over 100 yards/game on the ground, good for
25th nationally. OC McCall is definitely calling his number more often than
McGee did last year (albeit in limited action), and he's also getting the ball a
good number of times in the passing game. Tyrell has shown once again that he
can make things happen when given the ball in space, tearing off a 66 yard run
against MSU, and also sporting a nice 44 yard TD run in the rain against SIU.
He provides quiet leadership by going out and getting the job done, and saying
all the right things when being interviewed. Conteh has been used a good amount
to give Tyrell some rest, but hasn't fared nearly as well as he did last year as
the starter while Sutton was injured, with 141 yards on 43 carries (3.3 ypc), 2
TDs, and 32 yards on 5 receptions. In terms of "superbacks" we've mostly seen
Rooks in as a blocking TE (he does have a TD reception out of only 2 receptions
on the year) and Rooks or Woodsum as a blocking H-back. It is difficult to
evaluate their effectiveness blocking, although NU's relative success running
the ball is a testament to decent run blocking.
Wide Receivers: B- Although the top 3
guys (Lane, Peterman, Ward) are usually reliable and have the ability to make
some big plays, they have disappointed thus far in 2008. First off, there were
a bunch of dropped passes against Duke that almost cost NU the game;
fortunately, they got things together in time to pull out the win. Secondly,
they just haven't been getting open as often as one would hope when running a
spread attack. I do consider that most of the blame here belongs most probably
to OC McCall, whose offensive game plan has seemed to cause confusion at times
and also hasn't given NU a lot of chances to hit the big play. As mentioned in
a commentary earlier this year, the offensive gameplan seems to force the entire
offense to "think too much" instead of executing precise routes and CJ finding
the open guy - there is a lot of last minute adjusting of routes and watching of
signals from the sideline that must occur. And the no huddle definitely does
not help in this regard. The only positive is that hopefully after 6 games, the
offense will be on the same page more often and can begin to click soon.
Notably absent from the WR contributors has been Andrew Brewer, who has a ton of
pure talent and was expected to make waves at WR this year - but he was set back
early with drops followed by a leg injury that kept him on the sidelines for a
couple of games before the bye. Even against MSU he was used almost exclusively
on running plays as a blocker on the outside. After the offense as a whole, he
could probably be considered a disappointment, although he definitely will have
an opportunity to contribute and increase his level of play down the stretch -
which will be important since he will likely take over the role as the top
receiver after the top 3 guys graduate. NU has also been fortunate to get
contributions from some backups, such as Sidney Stewart and true freshman Jeremy
Ebert (who has been starting in the second slot position).
Offensive Line: A- As noted, they are the biggest
surprise of the season, especially due to their lack of experience coming into
the year. And it's even more amazing that the only two guys with significant
starting experience before (Belding and Mattes) have been passed on the 2-deep
(Mattes was out due to injury for a good period of time). The numbers (sacks
allowed and rushing yards per carry), mentioned earlier, speak for themselves:
this unit is doing a solid job and continues to improve. And they've faced some
solid DLs, as well. The failures of the offense are most definitely not due to
the line, and the fact that there are 3 redshirt freshmen on the line is a huge
positive for future seasons, as well. It is also amazing looking back to last
year when the relatively experienced OL (only one new starter at the beginning
of the year and 2 potential next-level players) allowed a whopping 17 sacks and
comparing that to this unit which has allowed only 3. And there is definitely
more talent in the pipeline, with even more young players pushing for playing
time and a set of true freshmen waiting in the wings as well.
Defense
Grade: A- Stats
(national rank): 16.5 points/game (23rd), 316.0 yds/game (37th), 31.8%
3rd Down Conversion Allowed (23rd), 114.3 rush yds/game allowed (37th), 201.7
pass yds/game allowed (58th), 11 turnovers gained: 4 INT & 7 fumbles (58th),
3.17 sacks/game (7th), 7.5 TFLs/game (15th). Overall:
Defensive Line: A It
all starts up front, and this unit has led the way for the entire defense,
helping NU get into the backfield and make plays, which directly translates into
the national top 10 sack and TFL numbers. The potential has been there for at
least a couple of years now, with Wootton, Gill, and Mims all returning as
starters once again, but now under new DC Hankwitz and DL coach Long, the
performance of this unit has been transformed. They have been able to stop the
run (allowing just 114.3 rush yards/game and contained MSU's Ringer rather well)
and even better getting to the passer. The sack and TFL numbers don't even
reflect the number of QB hurries this group has had, which is significant. It
is clear that the one unit benefitting most from the "attacking" defense (as
opposed to Colby's "read and react" D) is the line. Credit also deserves to be
doled out to the backups in the DL rotation - most notably Browne who had a
fantastic game against Ohio, but also Hahn and Thomas - as they have performed
rather consistently. The numbers they have put up are impressive: Wootton has 8
TFLs (4.5 sacks), 4 QB hurries, and 1 recovered fumble; Browne has 5 TFLs (3
sacks), 1 INT, 1 QB hurry, 2 forced fumbles, and a blocked kick; Bryant has 2.5
TFLs (1 sack), 1 QB hurry, 1 fumble recovery, and 1 forced fumble; Mims has 2
TFLs (1 sack); and Gill has 3 TFLs (2 sacks), 1 PBU, 1 QB hurry, 2 fumble
recoveries, and a blocked kick.
Linebackers: B+ Another potential weak spot to start the
year has definitely come together, led by Arrington in the middle (who just goes
out and makes tackles, and is second on the team with 48 for the season, with
6.5 TFLs, 1.5 sacks, and a PBU). He is flanked by Prince Kwateng, who is
quietly wreaking havoc (48 tackles, 2 TFLs, 1.5 sacks, 1 QB hurry, 1 forced
fumble) and sophomore Davie who has 34 tackles and a whopping 7.5 TFLs
(including 2.5 sacks), one PBU, and 4 QB hurries. Mike Dinard and Nate Williams
have also come in for backup duty. This group has contributed nicely and have
also contributed to the physical play up front in run-stopping and blitzes. The
most notable thing on the field is probably their speed; many have knocked these
players for a lack of speed, but they have come on strong, especially Davie who
is still young but has played very well and shown off significant
jets.
Secondary: B+ This unit has also shown significant
improvement, which can be attributed to large gains in the play of S Phillips
(the team's leading tackler, with 52 on the year, including 3.5 TFLs, 1 sack, 1
INT, 2 PBUs, and 1 forced fumble), the full-time return of S Brendan Smith (39
tackles, 2 TFLs, 1 INT with a 26 yard return for a TD, and a whopping 5 PBUs),
the consistent play of CB McManis (36 tackles, 6 PBUs), and the emergence of
Jordan Mabin at the other corner (25 tackles, 1 TFL, 1 INT, 2 PBUs, 1 fumble
recovery, 2 forced fumbles). Brian Peters has also emerged as a solid backup
safety / extra defensive back in nickel sets, and guys like Mike Bolden and
David Arnold are waiting in the wings while contributing on special teams. This
unit has directly benefitted from solid play up front - not having to chase
around receivers all day - and have done an excellent job limiting the big
plays. They will have more challenges as the season progresses, as NU faces
more pass-heavy teams (Syracuse, Iowa, and MSU all ran pretty traditional
run-based offenses, while Purdue, Indiana, Minnesota, Michigan, and Illinois all
run the spread - along with OSU, to some extent).
Special Teams
Grade: B+ Stats: 11/13 FGs (46 yard long), 14/15 XPs,
21.6 yds/kick return (57th), 18.3 yds/kick return defense (20th), 8.3 yds/punt
return (69th), 7.9 yds/punt return defense (54th). Overall: NU's special teams were one of its
strong points in every game until Michigan State, where an abysmal showing in
almost every aspect helped NU spot the Spartans a big lead early. But, outside
of that and some kicking game gaffes at Iowa (that were made up by a couple of
recovered fumbles by the punt and kick coverage teams), this part of the game
has been very solid for the 'Cats. It is obviously a priority for Coach Fitz,
as he garners special teams coaching duties himself, and with so many starters
and key contributors on the special teams units, it is obvious that NU wants to
be successful there. In addition to the stats above, the Wildcats also have a
blocked punt, 2 blocked kicks, and some key fumble recoveries on coverage.
While things broke down a bit against MSU, this squad has shown some excellent
things in the first half of the year and should be able to put NU in a good
position the rest of the year.
Place
Kicker: B+ Amado Villarreal hit
his first 8 FGs of the year until the Iowa game came around, where he had a FG
blocked, and missed both a FG and XP. He has been more than serviceable,
though, going 11/13 on the year for FGs and 14/15 on XPs - and in close games
getting any points matters, so those FGs are key. He has also shown some good
leg, hitting a 46 yarder (his only attempt over 40 yards this year).
Fortunately, NU was able to churn out a win in his worst game of the year. And
going against tough Big Ten defenses the rest of the way, he will most likely be
called on relatively often down the stretch - bt as a senior he's been battle
tested and has the leg to come through.
Kickoffs: A- The stats look good; Demos is averaging
59.9 yards/kickoff with 4 touchbacks and opponents are gaining only 18.3
yards/kick return (20th nationally), but things began to go south against MSU
(who averaged almost 30 yards per return, including a 50 yard return, and that
doesn't count a huge gaffe on an attempted onside kick that ended with MSU
getting the ball on the NU 32 yard line). Demos apparently couldn't get the
ball deep enough against the Spartans, which he was able to do rather
consistently earlier in the year, and NU paid for it with some significant
returns against them - and eventually resorted to the pooch kick. In the
previous games, though, the 'Cats routinely used strong kicks from Stefan to
stick opponents deep in their own territory with solid kick coverage. Hopefully
this is something that can be corrected down the stretch as Demos definitely has
the leg strength to get it deep and prevent a big return.
Punting: A Where NU has really excelled, though, is
punting, with Demos averaging 38.1 yards/punt on 29 punts, with a whopping 12
inside the 20 and 3 50+ yard boots. And this is all utilizing the 3x3 punt
formation and rugby-style kicks from Demos instead of the tradtional high punt
on most occasions (Demos has also shown the ability to do that to stick the
opponent in their own end). Against Syracuse, Stefan nailed every punt, with 6
for 6 going inside the 20 (and one that was downed at the 3 leading to an NU
safety for its first points of the year). And the unique punt formation and
punting style definitely leave the possibility open for things to happen -
either a pass if one of the gunners is left open, or the chance that the
bouncing ball hits an opponent that would give NU the chance to pick up the
ball. And this unit has also done a nice job of limiting returns, although,
again, there was a significant return by MSU (20 yards) that hurt the
'Cats.
Returns: B- This is probably the one weak spot on the
'Cats special teams that could use more work; Matthews and Conteh have provided
some spark on kick returns, but nobody has broken one for a TD yet (Simmons has
been hampered with an ankle injury suffered against SIU). Punt returns,
meanwhile haven't produced much of anything, with Smith now taking over the
duties (Peterman muffed a punt this year). In terms of statistics, NU is middle
of the road in both categories, but the spark for a big return doesn't seem to
be there. I believe that NU has a chance to make things happen on kick returns
as Matthews has shown a lot of potential (in addition to his hitting abilities
on the coverage teams where he helped knock out a couple of fumbles against
Iowa). McManis had shown some good kick returning abilities earlier in his
career but had a dismal day against MSU where he fumbled a return and mishandled
another and only got out to the 5.
Coaching
Grade: A Overall: The fact is that NU is 5-1, and this
year defeated all nonconference opponents and won its first 5 games for the
first time since the 1960's under Ara Parseghian. The defense has seen
considerable improvement, and special teams have been solid. NU is winning
games that it should win. All of that equals an "A" performance from Coach Fitz
and his staff. The most obvious move was the firing of Colby in the offseason
and the pickup of DC Hankwitz, who has led this turnaround on the defensive side
of the ball. Also, don't discount the hiring of DL coach Long, who has helped
fire up his unit to lead the way on D. On offense, things haven't always gone
NU's way and the production has been a bit of a letdown, but McCall is a solid
coach and has helped the unit do enough to pull off a couple of comeback wins
and to bounce back from some poor performances. And after some infuriating
games during his first two seasons, Coach Fitz has shown how much he's grown
with experience this season and is producing a consistent winner that is well on
its way to a bowl berth.
Other
Stats
Below are a few stats that don't show up in the unit
rankings:
Turnover margin /game: 0.0 (55th), time of possession /game
27:12 (108th), 5.17 penalties/game (33rd), 50.0 penalty yards/game
(52nd).
Go 'Cats!!!
e-mail: j-hodges@alumni.northwestern.edu
Previous jhodges commentary
jhodges
is the primary content provider of HailToPurple.com. His commentary
and game analyses appear regularly during the season and occasionally
in the offseason.
|
|
|