|
|
jhodges Commentary
Posted 1/14/08
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commentary: Response to Daily Northwestern Article Concerning NU Leaving the Big Ten
by Jonathan Hodges
It was a busy week for Coach Fitz last week as he grabbed both a defensive and
offensive coordinator after letting go of previoayers in place, a HC with more experience, and an OC
with some coordinator experience, hopefully
On February 7, 2008, Jake Simpson published an
article in "The Weekly" supplement to the Daily Northwestern exploring
a "what if" scenario of Northwestern leaving the Big Ten. Given that this is a
completely insane notion at this point, I refuted many of his specific points in a
Letter to the Editor that was published on February 8, 2008 in the
Forum of the Daily Northwestern. The text of my letter is copied
below:
In response to Jake Simpson's article ("What if NU Said
Goodbye to the Big Ten," Feb. 7) regarding NU dropping out of the Big Ten
conference, I must first say it is a completely ludicrous idea. The only sport
that he considers is football - and the fact is that NU competes in 19 varsity
sports and is very competitive in many of them, if not a perennial conference
champion (see women's tennis). Sure, football is the cash cow sport, but the Big
Ten athletic conference includes many sports and isn't solely about football.
Secondly, Jake refuses to acknowledge that NU football has been more
than competitive in the conference since 1995, winning 3 conference titles (the
only teams with more titles over that span happen to be Ohio State and Michigan,
and that's it) and going to 5 bowl games in that span.
Just looking at
NU's success over that span should throw the idea that NU should leave the
conference out the window. To address his assertion that the Big Ten
conference's membership has been in "flux," the fact is that the Big Ten
membership has been one of the most stable over time and has led to the Big Ten
being one of the preeminent conferences in the nation, not only in football but
also in most other sports.
After the initial membership changes in the
early 1900's, the only changes have been the University of Chicago dropping out
(and dropping out of scholarship athletics altogether), Michigan State
University joining (both occurring before 1950), and Penn State joining in 1991.
NU has played an integral role in the conference, being both a founding member
and a significant contributor in both the academic and athletic arenas over
time.
If one were to even entertain the notion of NU leaving the Big
Ten, the only recourse would probably be to drop to a lower level of
intercollegiate competition, which would most definitely hurt the university's
standing as one of the top nationally renowned academic institutions and one of
the most well rounded colleges around. Being an independent is no longer a
viable option for schools at the NCAA Div. I-A/FBS level of competition due to
financial and scheduling reasons.
Notre Dame, Army, and Navy can pull it
off due to lucrative TV contracts and a "tradition" of being independent along
with historical matchups, which allow for easier scheduling of games. And
joining a "lower tier" conference (like the MAC or C-USA) would not be in line
with NU's commitment to excellence both on the field of play and in the
classroom.
I know that myself and the vast majority of the NU community
strongly support the university's place in the Big Ten and see the value in
being part of such a solid group of peer institutions - and see how it gives
advantages to the school athletically, academically, and as a whole.
-
Jonathan Hodges
McCormick '05
Former Member of the NU Marching
Band |
I obviously would be completely against the notion of
Northwestern leaving the Big Ten, if that were even in the realm of
possibilities, but would support a discussion/debate about the potential of NU
either going the way of the University of Chicago (moving to non-scholarship
Div. III athletics) or the way of the Ivy League (not handing out athletic
scholarships). The fact is, though, that the original article in this scenario
did not address those possibilities (only NU being an independent or moving to a
"lesser" I-A/FBS conference, both of which are virtually impossible financially
and academically for NU) and instead relied on faulty if not just plain wrong
logic.
In any case, this issue should be pretty well put to bed at this
point after heavy discussion on the message boards and my response in the
Daily. Northwestern is competitive if not the team to beat in the conference in
many sports - and football, the main target of the article, has been very
successful in the past decade and a half or so. While NU is the only private
institution in the conference and is vastly smaller than most other schools in
the Big Ten, the fact is that NU has a home both academically and athletically
in this community of peer institutions and provides a unique addition to the
conference. Finally, moving out of the conference would definitely hurt NU's
financial standing (regarding athletics) and would most likely affect NU's
academic standing by damaging the well-rounded community that is benefited by
the presence of Div. I-A/FBS athletics.
e-mail: j-hodges@alumni.northwestern.edu
Previous jhodges commentary
jhodges' commentary does not necessarily reflect the views of HailToPurple.com.
|
|
|