|
|
jhodges Commentary
Posted 11/11/11
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commentary: Further thoughts on PSU including views from another angle
by Jonathan Hodges
Once again, my thoughts and prayers go out to the real victims of this horrible
mess and I hope that the outpouring of support from around the nation gives them
strength to continue on, and I also hope that this all leads to something
positive down the line in terms of an act that is prevented or reported that
otherwise might not have been. One hopes that the primary lesson here is: "if
you see something, say something," and here is one place you can call: Childhelp
National Child Abuse Hotline: 1-800-4-A-CHILD http://www.childhelp.org/pages/hotline
In my
previous commentary on this matter, I tried to give it time before writing in
order to get as much of the picture as possible and develop a thoughtful yet
timely opinion. I realize that I was essentially jumping on the bandwagon with
almost the entire nation outside of State College by calling for the immediate
dismissal of Joe Paterno and Graham Spanier. I still believe that those moves
were well justified, as I will explain later. But first, I must present another
view.
Taking football and the relative stature of his person out of this,
the firing of Paterno may not have been such a good thing in one specific way:
it could easily be seen as retribution for reporting the crime when he very well
may have been better off covering it up himself. Although there were certainly
further things he could have done from a moral standpoint, he followed the
letter of the law (hence why the prosecutor did not bring him up on charges) and
brought it to his superiors. He was not the one who directly covered up the
crime, and instead did what we all hope one would do: tell someone who can take
action. It is quite possible that someone somewhere saw what happened and
decides to cover up a similar accusation at their level instead of risking the
trouble of passing it along or calling it in. I must credit my wife, a child
psychologist and mandatory reporter (of child abuse), for being strong in this
view, and I think it is a legitimate one.
But, I believe, as many others
also do, that Paterno was much more than a regular reporter: he was one of the
most powerful people on campus, likely more powerful than the two men who were
ultimately charged with perjury and essentially covering up the matter. He
purported himself in an ethical manner and preached morality time and time
again, yet he just didn't go far enough. This inaction directly led to the
current quagmire that the university is in, but, more importantly, allowed a
predator to continue victimizing innocent children. His statements in recent
days somewhat acknowledge that he did not do enough, but fail to recognize the
gravity of the entire situation. To him, football was more important, hence his
somewhat pompous statement about retiring at the end of the season and
declaration that the Board of Trustees need not concern themselves with
him.
And that leads to the wider problem, that football was worth
covering up such crimes. While the football program has been fairly
characterized as a "clean" program from an academic and NCAA perspective, it had
clearly become a priority over more important matters. Unfortunately, this
prioritization was demonstrated in one of the worst possible ways. And it
ultimately emanated from one man: Paterno. With that and the whirlwind that
followed the release of the indictments, it was clear that the only way to
proceed was to let him go, and that is what the PSU board did.
Of course
this is not to excuse the PSU administration from what was very poor handling of
the situation. Reports of the grand jury investigation (including testimony by
Paterno and the athletic director plus many further details) surfaced on March
31 of this year yet the university seemed stunned when this came out on November
5th. Immediately after word came out and the horrid details started to
circulate, Spanier promptly put his "unconditional support" behind the two
university officials charged and left it at that. Then, Penn State seemingly
went into lockdown mode, releasing hardly any statement and making no public
appearances until the infamous press conference on the evening of November 9th
at which the fate of Paterno and Spanier was announced. In today's society,
with the national media descended onto campus and students marching, it took
them much too long to respond. While they ultimately made the right call for
the bad situation, they could have headed a lot of it off by acting sooner:
putting the involved parties on immediate leave and trying to head off the story
that took a life of its own. And before worrying about the PR, they should have
mentioned and apologized to the victims and shown their sincerity in
remorse.
Another note on the fact that the graduate assistant mentioned
in the grand jury report, Mike McQueary, the witness to the alleged 2002
incident, remains employed as an assistant coach and will, as of now, be
coaching this Saturday [ed. note: McQueary has been placed on leave since jhodges wrote this column]. Many rightly question why he chose to take no action
when he witnessed the crime and instead chose to run and only report it to
Paterno the next day. Like I said in my earlier piece, I have no idea what I
would have done and won't pass judgment on him; at the very least, he reported
it to his superior. There is a lot in play (the perpetrator, Jerry Sandusky, is
a close family friend) and maybe even more than anyone currently knows. What
does seem to be the case is that the possibility is there that Paterno softened
his words when sending the report up the ladder, and that seems to be a
plausible explanation as of why Paterno was let go and McQueary remains employed
(for now). There's more that may be in play (e.g. Whistleblower Statutes) but
we likely won't know the whole story for some time as things play out in the
court of law. But I will reserve complete judgment until the story has
progressed further.
This is indeed a horrible situation that one would
not wish on anyone. I have strong feelings but will not pretend like I have the
answers or would have necessarily handled things better as I have the benefit of
hindsight and distance. The ultimate criminal is Sandusky, and he will get his
due via the justice system. It appears that the primary players that were not
charged (Paterno and Spanier) have now received their due. This is an extremely
complex story with twists and turns appearing almost every day, and it will
continue to evolve for some time, even through the inevitable trials that are
forthcoming. But we can all learn from what has and is happening and can
hopefully make some good come of this.
Now that the immediate situation
has been resolved as much as it can be, we can shift most of our focus back to
football, though we will be continually reminded of what happened and can
hopefully help the healing process for the victims here, victims of abuse around
the country, and the rebuilding of an institution that has otherwise lived up to
high ideals.
e-mail: j-hodges@alumni.northwestern.edu
Previous jhodges commentary
jhodges
is the primary content provider of HailToPurple.com. His commentary
and game analyses appear regularly during the season and occasionally
in the offseason.
|
|
|