|
|
jhodges Commentary
Posted 10/26/10
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commentary: Fitz and the Fourth Quarter
by Jonathan Hodges
Last Saturday's loss to Michigan State marked Northwestern's second consecutive
game in which the 'Cats blew a fourth quarter lead. Winning just one of those
games would put NU in the national rankings (and with two wins: well, one can
dream). With a similar streak last season (consecutive blown fourth quarter
leads to Syracuse and Minnesota), it really begs the question: do Coach Fitz's
teams lack that fourth quarter instinct that seemed to make Randy Walker's teams
so special? Let's take a closer look.
In Position to
Win
Going into the fourth quarter, Fitz's teams have been tied or had
the lead 64.9% of the time in his head coaching career (57 games). Which means,
almost two thirds of the time, Fitz has his teams in a position to take the game
down the stretch. If one expands that by looking at the games where NU has held
a lead or been tied in the fourth quarter, that percentage goes up to 71.9%,
quite an impressive number given that the 'Cats' sustained 8 losses in his first
year and NU has only been favored in 47.4% of his games as head coach.
In
fact, Fitz has easily eclipsed his predecessor in terms of putting NU in a
position to win: Walker's teams entered the fourth quarter tied or with the lead
just 43.9% of the time and either became tied or held a lead sometime during the
fourth quarter 52.4% of the time. Fitz has approximately a 20% edge in both of
those statistics (noting that Walker's career spanned 82 games).
It's
clear that Fitz's recruiting efforts, coordinator/assistant coach hires, and
leadership ability have helped propel Northwestern into a position where it can
win almost any game. And that's even an upgrade from Walker, who presided over
one of the most consistent periods in NU football history, with three bowl
appearances and another 6-6 campaign on his resume.
Fourth Quarter
Scoring
Despite putting the Wildcats in a position to win at the end
of the game, the 'Cats haven't necessarily performed that well in the final
period, under either coach. Fitz's teams have outscored its opponents just
33.3% of the time in the fourth quarter, while Walker's teams did so even fewer
times (30.5%). Adding in number of times the teams have tied their opponents'
scores, those percentages go up to a decent (but not great) 63.2% for Fitz and
51.2% for Randy Walker.
But, adding up the cumulative fourth quarter
scores, it provides a slightly different picture: Fitz's teams have a point
differential margin per game average of -1.54 points in fourth quarters, while
Walker's teams were a full point less at -0.54 points. Coach Fitz's teams have
cumulatively outscored its opponents during only one year of his tenure (2008,
by a margin of 62-44), and this year's team has a long way to go as it's been
outscored 35-60 (this past week's 3-21 performance certainly didn't
help).
Also looking at this year's team, the 'Cats have been outgained in
terms of total yards in the final period in 5 of 7 games, with a cumulative
differential of -47.1 yards per game in the fourth. Yes, some garbage time is
included in that number, but in some of the closer games (e.g. the most recent
two, both losses), the 'Cats have been significantly outplayed. Meanwhile,
Walker's teams generally kept it closer and didn't seem to experience as many
complete collapses.
Blown Leads and Comebacks
Speaking
of collapses, the most noticeable artifact of a team's fourth quarter prowess is
the number of blown leads. This, of course, is especially pertinent now due to
Northwestern's aforementioned current two game blown fourth quarter lead
streak.
Walker was known for taking care of business in the fourth
quarter, as he held a 86.2% win rate when his teams entered the final quarter
with the lead (and an 83.3% rate when they were winning or tied). Fitz,
meanwhile, has lagged in this area, holding a 72.7% win rate when his teams are
ahead entering the final quarter (70.3% when winning or tied). Those are both
over 10% lower under Fitz than Walker.
In fact, Fitz has blown a fourth
quarter lead 9 times, or 22.5% of the games in which he held such a lead.
Walker only blew 5 such leads in his tenure at Northwestern, or 12.8% of the
time; again, about 10% less than Fitz. Coach Fitz has experienced at least
blown lead in every season (although it took until the bowl game in 2008),
including 3 such losses in 2007 and 2 in each of the last 2 seasons (including
the current season, which has 5 games remaining).
Finally, one must give
credit where credit is due, and Fitz has helped his teams to engineer 6 fourth
quarter comebacks (10.5% of his total games coached), while Walker's teams
managed just 7 such victories (8.5% of his games coached).
What It
Means
While Coach Fitz has put his teams in a position to win more
games in that final period, his teams haven't necessarily fared as well in that
crucial final period, and have, in fact, blown more leads during that span. His
predecessor, Coach Walker, generally did a better job of holding onto his leads
and kept the point differential in the final period significantly closer despite
dealing with four losing seasons in his tenure (to just one under
Fitz).
So, the question is: why? Some of my ideas appear
below.
Conditioning
Coach Walker was well known for his
tough conditioning drills and the infamous test. His teams were physically
prepared for the final period, as demonstrated in their 2000 Big Ten title run
where they outscored opponents by an average of 1.9 points in the fourth quarter
of games. Meanwhile, Fitzgerald has been a bit more lenient relative to Walker
(although he's no pushover) and it has shown in the blown leads, being
outgained, and being outscored.
Lack of a Running
Game
As I wrote just a couple of weeks ago here at
HailToPurple, the current lack of running game has really hurt the 'Cats
when trying to preserve and/or extend leads in the fourth quarter. Fitz's teams
have blown 7 fourth quarter leads during years in which the 'Cats have basically
lacked a solid ground game (2007, 2009, and 2010). Meanwhile, Walker's teams
had quite a string of solid RBs featured in the offense (Damien Anderson, Jason
Wright, Noah Herron, Tyrell Sutton) and were able to take care of business in
the final period most of the time with the help of those
backs.
Coaching Inexperience
Despite his proven skills
in the leadership and recruiting arenas, his in-game management is still lacking
at times. It's hard to knock a coach who has an overall winning record and is
on the cusp of entering the top 5 most winning coaches in school history, but
part of supporting a winning program is expecting the best from the team. Fitz
has made some questionable decisions that have led to losses (two such decisions
come to mind immediately: taking 3 points off the board against Duke in 2007 and
not properly anticipating a fake punt attempt in NU's most recent game against
MSU), and has also made some general decisions that have forced fans to scratch
their heads (going conservative to try and milk the lead, especially when an
aggressive offense seems to be working well). Yes, he now has experienced
coordinators at his side, but the decisions are ultimately his, and his still
relative lack of experience as the decision maker shows itself from time to
time.
Final Thought
What is nice, though, is that Coach
Fitz has and continues to put his teams in a position to win games at the end.
He's gaining valuable experience on the job and will be in a much better
position in terms of decision-making before too long (and he's already made some
great decisions to date). Improving the run game is a priority, and it's
already beginning to show with Northwestern outgaining its last opponent (MSU)
on the ground. And while he may not be matching Walker's demanding conditioning
routine, he expects a lot out of his players and is bringing in more talent than
anybody else in school history, which, in the long run, will lead to more
success than just trying to maximize lower tier players (not to diminish any
accomplishments of individual players who rise above their recruiting profile,
which is something Northwestern sees quite often).
Hopefully we'll see
improvement in all of these areas in order to yield more fourth quarter success
for the Wildcats. It's also tough to meet high expectations in that final
period, where Northwestern is almost expected to pull out close victories every
game in order to live up to that "Cardiac 'Cats" nickname.
Go
'Cats!!!
e-mail: j-hodges@alumni.northwestern.edu
Previous jhodges commentary
jhodges
is the primary content provider of HailToPurple.com. His commentary
and game analyses appear regularly during the season and occasionally
in the offseason.
|
|
|