|
|
jhodges Commentary
Posted 9/2/10
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commentary: Big Ten Divisions and Northwestern's 2011-2012 Conference Schedules
by Jonathan Hodges
Yesterday, the Big Ten made its divisional alignment, for 2011 and beyond, official as well as releasing the conference schedule for the
2011-2012 seasons. There's a lot to get to and a lot to analyze from
Northwestern's perspective, so let's jump right in:
Big Ten
Divisions
Here are the two divisions that are as yet unnamed. On the
Big Ten Network special yesterday, conference commissioner Jim Delany gave a 90
day timetable for the Big Ten's rebranding which will include names for each
division as well as, potentially, names for each division trophy as well as the
conference trophy. The Big Ten Conference will, of course, retain its name,
although will get a new logo that will be unveiled alongside the division/trophy
names sometime during the fall. The Division "X" and "O" names are placeholders
that the BTN used which will allow some distinction besides calling them "the
Ohio State division" and "the Michigan division," which everyone knows is pretty
much the case.
Division "X": Ohio State, Penn State, Wisconsin,
Purdue, Illinois, Indiana
Division "O": Michigan, Nebraska, Iowa,
Michigan State, Minnesota, Northwestern
Protected Intra-Division
Rivalries (will play every year):
Ohio State - Michigan
Penn State -
Nebraska
Wisconsin - Minnesota
Purdue - Iowa
Illinois -
Northwestern
Indiana - Michigan State
For the time being (at least
until 2015) there will still be eight conference games, four at home and four on
the road, with the current scheduling rules being maintained (no more than two
consecutive conference games on the road or at home, and there must be two home
games and two road games for each team in both the first and second halves of
the conference slate). Also, the conference will still use a two year
scheduling cycle where the opponents will remain the same for back-to-back
seasons, rotating home and away games (although, like in the current scheduling
system, when the conference moves into a new cycle the home/away rotation may
not be maintained, e.g. Northwestern played at Iowa in both 2008 and
2009).
This means that each season teams will play two other "rotating"
teams from the other division and will not play three teams from the
other division in any given year. More on how that breaks down for the
2011-2012 cycle in a moment. This, of course, means that teams won't see one
cross-division opponent for four consecutive years, meaning undergrads may go
through college without seeing their team play one conference opponent (unless
they meet in the conference title game).
Divisional
Details
First off, it's clear that competitive balance was the
ultimate driver in how the Big Ten split the divisions. As Lindsey Willhite
from the Daily Herald pointed out yesterday, the divisions have exactly the same
0.580 overall winning percentages over the evaluation span of 1993-2009. Also,
each division possesses two marquee programs that rank among the top six in NCAA
Div. I FBS in all-time wins: Ohio State and Penn State in Division "X" and
Michigan and Nebraska in Division "Y."
Second, it's clear that rivalries
are important and this divisional structure maintains the majority of those
rivalries and builds potential new ones. 10 of the league's 13 trophy games
(that includes the Ohio State-Michigan game, which doesn't actually have a
trophy) are maintained as annual contests in the new setup, losing only the
Heartland Trophy (Wisconsin - Iowa, which has only been a trophy game since
2004), the Governor's Victory Bell (Minnesota - Penn State, which originated in
1993 and hasn't been played annually anyway), and the Land Grant Trophy
(Michigan State - Penn State, also originating in 1993).
Although two
current annual trophied contests are lost (Wisconsin - Iowa and Michigan State -
Penn State), three trophy games that currently rotate off the schedule will now
become annual contests: the Illibuck (Illinois - Ohio State), the Old Brass
Spittoon (Michigan State - Indiana), and the Little Brown Jug (Michigan -
Minnesota). Plus, Nebraska will have an opportunity to foster rivalries with
nearby Minnesota and Iowa as well as Penn State, its cross-division protected
opponent.
Plus, playing six conference rivals annually that never rotate
off the schedule will foster additional rivalries that are not really possible
in the current system where each team only faces two protected opponents each
season.
Finally, geography did play a bit of a factor, with the
conference essentially drawing a diagonal line dividing the conference into
northwest and southeast and then trading Wisconsin and Illinois to meet
competitive requirements. And with cross-divisional games taking place as it
is, it's not like any team would have it that easy in terms of travel (although
Northwestern, being relatively centrally located, has it a lot easier than teams
at the extremes, like Penn State and Nebraska, who are separated by 1,088
driving miles).
Football Only
In the BTN unveiling
show, Delany made it clear that these divisions were put in place for football
only. Although rumors initially swirled that the Big Ten would adopt divisions
and a basketball scheduling model similar to the SEC and current Big XII, Delany
insisted that was not the case and that basketball would essentially chart its
own course when it comes to scheduling. Reading between the lines, that likely
means more conference games for basketball and a scheduling set up similar to
now where schools play most others twice (home/away) and a handful just once on
a rotating basis.
Northwestern Breakdown
From the
perspective of the Wildcats, these divisions turned out rather well. First,
here are Northwestern's post-1993 records against their division (and Illinois,
their annual cross-division opponent) versus the other five members of the other
division.
NU vs. Division "O" + Illinois: 34-37
(0.479)
NU vs. Division "X" - Illinois: 25-41 (0.379)
That
should make it pretty clear that the Wildcats benefit from avoiding the likes of
Penn State and Ohio State annually. Speaking of that fact, here are the only
post-1993 Big Ten conference champions who did not play both Ohio State
and Michigan, and who they missed in that season:
2002 Iowa (OSU)
2000
Northwestern (OSU)
1998 Wisconsin (OSU)
1996 Northwestern (OSU)
1995
Northwestern (OSU)
Which makes it even more clear that it is beneficial
to miss Ohio State, since we all know the on-field success they have had during
this era (OSU has won nine outright or shared titles over this 17 year span).
This dovetails nicely into the next point, the 2011-2012 Northwestern
schedule
Northwestern's 2011-2012 Big Ten Schedules
The
conference schedules for the next two years were also unveiled, which are
prominently displayed elsewhere on HailToPurple. But, here is who Northwestern does
not play in each of the next two seasons.
Northwestern Does Not
Play in 2011-2012: Ohio State, Wisconsin, Purdue
This will mark a
FOUR year span in which the 'Cats won't play OSU in the regular season, with the
last matchup being the 45-10 loss to the Buckeyes in Evanston in 2008 (of
course, it is possible that NU could face OSU in a conference title game in
either 2011 or 2012). Wisconsin will also quickly rotate back off the schedule
as they were most recently off NU's schedule for 2007-2008. This will also mark
the first year in which the 'Cats won't face Purdue since 1994, at which point
the Boilermakers became one of Northwestern's two "protected
rivals."
Also, here are NU's home/away breakdowns for each
season.
2011 HOME:MICHIGAN, PENN STATE, MINNESOTA, MICHIGAN
STATE
2011 away: Illinois, Iowa, Indiana, Nebraska
2012
HOME: INDIANA, NEBRASKA, IOWA, ILLINOIS
2012 away: Penn State,
Minnesota, Michigan, Michigan State
This is a rather beneficial breakdown
as NU splits up the four toughest anticipated opponents in terms of home/away
games for the next two seasons (Michigan and Penn State together, Nebraska and
Iowa together). Also, while the schedule does have some tough stretches (at
Iowa and vs. Penn State in back-to-back weeks in October 2011, and vs. Nebraska
and vs. Iowa in October 2012), NU does get an early November "bye" both seasons
to split up the schedule pretty well and also doesn't have to face three of the
expected difficult matchups consecutively.
From an attendance standpoint,
neither season is that bad as Michigan and Nebraska should help promote huge
jumps in attendance for those games (if not easy sellouts), and cross-division
games should also bring additional interest given that teams won't play as
often.
Note that from Northwestern's non-conference schedule, which had
been announced through 2012, a game versus Rice in Evanston on November 26, 2011
will now have to move as the 'Cats will face MSU at home that day. NU's current
open dates for the 2011 season are September 24 and November 12. It's also
possible that the game could be moved to another season, leaving NU scrambling
to find another opponent for next year (especially since the 'Cats already have
an FCS opponent, Eastern Illinois, lined up).
Other Big Ten
Schedules
Here are the teams that the following schools do NOT
play in the 2011-2012 cycle (note that Northwestern's list is
above):
Ohio State: Northwestern, Iowa, Minnesota
Penn
State: Minnesota, Michigan, Michigan State
Wisconsin:
Northwestern, Michigan, Iowa
Purdue: Northwestern, Michigan State,
Nebraska
Illinois: Michigan State, Nebraska, Iowa
Indiana:
Michigan, Nebraska, Minnesota
Nebraska: Indiana, Illinois,
Purdue
Michigan: Penn State, Wisconsin, Indiana
Iowa:
Illinois, Wisconsin, Ohio State
Minnesota: Ohio State, Penn State,
Indiana
Michigan State: Penn State, Purdue, Illinois
Nebraska:
"Welcome to the Big Ten." They will face a formidable schedule their first two
seasons in the league that will feature all of the traditional powers from their
opposite division. Needless to say, every Big Ten game they play will draw huge
interest, starting off next season when they visit Wisconsin to kick off Big Ten
play and then host Ohio State the following week.
Tiebreakers for
Conference Championship Game
The BTN special provided limited
clarification of tiebreakers for determining the participants in the conference
championship game in cases of a tie within the division, although there are some
details that have not yet been worked out. This is of particular concern given
the mess that occurred in the Big XII South just a couple of seasons ago (2008)
where Texas, Oklahoma, and Texas Tech tied and had beaten each other, leaving
the tiebreaker up to the BCS standings at the end of the season, which, of
course, favored the team that most recently had won (Oklahoma over Texas Tech)
in spite of its earlier loss to Texas.
The participant will be determined
by best conference record (including both inter and intra division
games):
Two-Team Tie:
- Head-to-head
Three or More
Team Tie:
- Head-to-head
- Division record
- "BCS
component"
One interesting note is that the overall record does not
appear on the list of tiebreakers, except as part of the "BCS component" (since
overall record does play a part in the BCS through the computer rankings and the
voters' minds in the polls). Also, it's clear that the Big Ten hasn't made up
its mind relative to how to use the BCS since it didn't straight-up reference
the ranking itself. It will be interesting to see how this shakes out and what
the final tiebreaking criteria are, especially since it's quite possible for
upsets to occur and teams to beat up each other within the
division.
Winners, Losers, and More
First, let me say
that in Big Ten divisional alignment, not everyone would be made happy. Not all
rivalries/trophy games could be maintained and with competitive balance being
the primary concern, it was clear that things would not necessarily make sense
geographically. Things were definitely going to change and it's clear that the
Big Ten tried to maintain tradition while incorporating the necessary change,
and they also listened to fans during the process, more on that
below.
Winner: Northwestern. Honestly, the 'Cats avoid
having to play Ohio State, Penn State, and Wisconsin annually and get a
protected rivalry game against Illinois, maintaining the one rivalry game of
which NU is a part. Northwestern also gets to maintain its budding rivalry with
Iowa and also gets to face newcomer Nebraska annually. Also, NU will get to
face four of the six teams against whom the 'Cats have had the most success in
the post-1993 era (while avoiding annual matchups versus the two against whom NU
has had the least success).
Loser: Wisconsin. The Badgers
lose their annual bout with Iowa, which has been a hotly contested battle over
the last decade and a half or so and is an important rivalry game with a
trophy. They do preserve their battle for Paul Bunyan's Axe with Minnesota, the
longest-running rivalry in college football. But they also don't get a
potential new rivalry with Nebraska, which Wisconsin AD Barry Alvarez stumped
for following the announcement that his alma mater would be joining the
conference. They're also stuck in probably the worst position geographically
relative to the other members of their division.
Another Winner:
Ohio State - Michigan. The annual game will be maintained and will be
played during the last weekend of Big Ten conference play each season, despite
the fact that they were placed in opposite divisions. After comments from the
OSU and Michigan ADs during the BTN special, it's clear that there were
discussions about moving the date earlier in the year, but that was quickly
quashed thanks to a large fan uprising (and not just from OSU and Michigan
fans). Although this sets up a potential rematch in the conference
championship, it was important that the two winningest programs in the "old" Big
Ten be split up in order to maintain balance in the new conference, and it was
obviously also important to keep the game during the last week of the regular
season.
More Changes?
Nine Game Conference
Schedule
That's right, we may not be done yet. As has been discussed
previously and Delany confirmed during the BTN special, a nine game conference
schedule is quite possible beginning in 2015, although that has not yet been
agreed upon by conference athletic directors and presidents (a decision they'll
make unanimously, like they did when Nebraska was invited to join and like the
division and scheduling decisions announced yesterday). This will potentially
allow another rotating opponent from the other division, which will eliminate
situations where a Big Ten opponent drops off the schedule for four consecutive
years.
A nine game conference slate would also mean unbalanced home/away
Big Ten games, which will be interesting, but it's not unprecedented as the
current Pac-10 plays a nine game conference slate in order to play all other
teams within the conference.
The biggest impact this will have is in
non-conference scheduling, as teams will be hard pressed to play home games,
especially if they have five conference away games in a given year. This means
teams will likely only be able to schedule a BCS-conference non-conference
opponent once in a given season, since such opponents typically demand
home-and-home agreements. The remaining two non-conference games will likely be
filled with one mid-major home game and one FCS home game.
This
realistically won't be that big of a deal from a strength of scheduling
standpoint since the additional conference game and the addition of traditional
power Nebraska to the Big Ten will add enough beef to the schedule to more than
make up for that. And all teams will have the potential to play in the
conference title game, which will add a big time opponent to the resume at the
latest possible point in the season.
It sounds like athletic directors
are working on their non-conference scheduling contracts, many of which are
already signed with dates through this decade, so we'll see if and when the nine
game conference slate gets approved and when it rolls out.
Division
Changes
Delany clearly left open the option of changes to the current
divisional structure based on the success both on and off the field over the
next two or more seasons. I don't expect to see major changes really soon,
although it is encouraging that the door was left open for change if necessary
down the road. This is obviously to avoid a Big XII type situation where one
division (South) clearly became the more powerful one and eventually led to the
erosion of their conference.
Future Expansion
And all of
that doesn't even consider the potential for future expansion, which Delany
confirmed on the BTN special as well. The Big Ten presidents will convene in
December to discuss the status of expansion as the originally announced 12-18
month window arrives, and at that point they may either decide to continue
expansion or put the topic to bed (at least for the next decade or so). All
bets are off if the expansion effort continues, but with Nebraska in the fold
starting next year, the Big Ten will be in relatively good shape and is clearly
one of the top two conferences nationally (along with the SEC). I'll refrain
from further comment and/or speculation since not only do I not believe it has a
high likelihood of occurring, but the Big Ten has also been plenty busy bringing
in Nebraska, leaving precious little time for further expansion investigations
right now.
Conclusion
I, for one, am glad that the Big
Ten divisions are settled and announced alongside the conference schedule for
the next two seasons. It is a time of change within the conference and
nationally and it will be a fun ride once the games are played.
It has
been quite a bit of information to digest just before the 2010 season kicks off;
at least Northwestern doesn't play a Thursday night game like Ohio State,
Indiana, and Minnesota, which gives those fanbases less than 24 hours to digest
this news which has been building during the entire
offseason.
Northwestern definitely ended up in a good place with its
divisional assignment and schedule for the 2011-2012 seasons, and 'Cats fans can
look forward to some entertaining games (annual matchups with Illinois, Iowa,
and Nebraska) and a shot to go to the Big Ten title game as well.
Go
'Cats!!!
e-mail: j-hodges@alumni.northwestern.edu
Previous jhodges commentary
jhodges
is the primary content provider of HailToPurple.com. His commentary
and game analyses appear regularly during the season and occasionally
in the offseason.
|
|
|