|
|
 |
|
|

Purdue Preview and Prediction
By The Lowes Line Staff
Matchup: Purdue Boilermakers (2-4, 0-3) at Northwestern Wildcats (4-2, 2-1) Location: Northwestern Medicine Field at Martin Stadium, Evanston, IL Date: Saturday, October 18, 2025, 2:00 pm CDT TV: BTN Line: Northwestern (-2.5), o/u: 47 Outlook:
Are the Northwestern Wildcats a good football team? All I know is that
we’re actually watching their games in October, which was unexpected.
But are they good? Maybe don’t try to answer that by watching the
Tulane game. Now that they’re 4-2, doesn’t that indicate some base
level of goodness? Let’s put it this way, nobody’s betting their
paycheck on the Wildcats any given week. Then again, they showed up in
a loss to Oregon, took care of business against ULM and UCLA, and got
Jimmy Franklin fired last week. That must mean they could be good? They
are favored this week at home against Purdue, but it’s still hard to
see a 6th win in the remaining schedule to gain bowl eligibility. Thus,
the question remains. Are the Northwestern WIldcats good?
Most
(all?) of the other Lowes Line writing staff might attempt to answer
this question by evaluating the QB, Preston Stone (see, I can name a
player!), or the RBs and WRs who have emerged over the last few games
(but I can name only 1 player). Or the defense, which has kept the team
in games. Or the lack of penalties and turnovers. Lots of, you know,
football stuff. But I see a different parallel. To me, the question “Is
Northwestern a good team” is just as challenging and important a
question as “Is ‘Robin Hood: Prince of Thieves’ a good movie?” Let’s
answer these thematically identical questions together, right now.
First
of all, I’m no film critic. Years ago, perhaps, I appreciated the
cinematic arts. But then I had kids. Now, I don’t rate or rank movies
with stars or thumbs, etc. I’m not some fart-sniffing connoisseur that
speaks of “film” or pronounces the word “movie” like it has 3 o’s.
These days, it’s the binary system. Is it good? Or is it not good? No
sliding scales. Basically, if I’m on my couch watching it and I need to
get up to take a dump, am I hitting pause or just coming back to it not
caring about the 20 minutes I just missed? Do the Wildcats, and Kevin
Costner’s rootin’ tootin’ arrow shootin’ epic, earn the pause button?
Conveniently enough, I’m watching Prince of Thieves right now on a
plane, so let’s dive in.
To
the extent this mooovie is a morality play, it gets right into the
dirt. Glad to see this story clearly establishes who were the good guys
and who were the bad guys in the Crusades. Costner looks like he was in
a FedEx plane crash. Not sure if that makes Morgan Freeman the
volleyball, or two walls from an old shitter. Brian
Blessed! Forgot Prince Vultan himself was in this. What a cameo. Too
bad he goes out like a bitch to a bunch of English Klan members right
at the beginning. Speaking
of which, we’re once again clearly defining the bad guys by putting
them in white sheets and hoods and Eyes Wide Shut masks. I especially
love the great Alan Rickman’s reveal as the Sheriff of Nottingham. Much
more menacing than the fat wolf in Disney’s version. “No man controls my destiny, especially not one who attacks downwind and stinks of garlic.” Carved into my tombstone, probably. There
is a disturbing amount of satanic occultism framed by religious
ecumenicalism between a pre- Reformation English Crusader and a Saracen
played by the same guy who eventually played the Almighty Himself.
Again, appreciate the lack of grey area between heroes and
villains. Christian Slater - he’s not in the same movie as anybody else. The unappreciated MVP of the movie. “I’m
going to cut your heart out with a spoon!” “Cousin, why a spoon?”
“Because it’s dull you twit, it will hurt more!” Kinda like the NU
offense. Uh,
it takes 59+ minutes of screen time before Robin Hood shoots an arrow.
But it’s worth it because Christian Slater is the first one to get
shot, right through his stupid hand. He’s amazing. Pretty sure that was
a real arrow, not a special effect. Slater is a notorious method actor. Once
Costner starts shootin’ off arrows, he doesn’t stop. Feels like merry
old England needed to implement common sense bow and arrow control. This
movie is objectively funny. The secret is to watch it as a comedy. At
least half the cast knows it’s a comedy, and they are killing it. The
other half of the cast that remains unaware that it’s a comedy are just
as funny. Kevin Costner is just a little too focused on keeping this
historically accurate to the real Robin Hood, who did not actually
exist by the way, but don’t tell Kevin Coster who is honoring Robin
Hood’s memory. Rickman
drops at least one banger of a one-liner in every scene. “And call off
Christmas!” Also the later callback line “Well, at least I didn’t use a
spoon.” Mary Elizabeth Mastrontoniolini is excellent. Legendary 90s movie babe. Every bit as good as the lady fox in the Disney version. I’ll
bet it was funny every time on set when Morgan Freeman yelled
“Christian” at Costner, but Slater kept saying “What?” I guarantee you
this is the most fun Morgan Freeman ever had making a movie. He
actually cracks up a couple of times in the background. I just had to get up and fight my way to the back of the plane for a little “comfort time.” I totally paused the movie. This
movie spawned a terrific Bryan Adams song and video, but the most
disappointing part of the movie is that the song itself isn’t plopped
right into the middle of it. It would have been gloriously out of
place, especially if it was just the full MTV video with no transition.
Total cowardice by the filmmakers not to put it in there. I should be
in Hollywood making movies. I have great ideas about how other people
should do their jobs. Just like a talking pinhead on MSNBC come to
think of it. People
who criticize Costner’s accent, or lack thereof, are missing the point.
He and Christian Slater are doing a bit. It’s basically a 90s white guy
Key & Peele sketch. Huge
dramatic scene when the Celts attack the forest village. Big hero shots
for Costner, and once again we know with certainty who the evil guys
are. The Scots. They’re obviously evil. It’s in the bible. Will
Scarlett hates Robin Hood so much that he refuses to use a bow, but
rather takes on the Celts with a tiny knife. Not a great warrior, but
I’ll bet he could have talked his way out of the Sheriff’s dungeon just
by doing Col. Jessup’s monologue from A Few Good Men. Speaking
of which, another clue that this is an intentional comedy is Morgan
Freeman’s comically large sword (or, scimitar for you cosplaying
medieval warrior nerds). True story – a few years later when Mel Gibson
made Braveheart, he told the costume/prop crew that his sword had to be
at least 35% bigger than Morgan Freeman’s scimitar in Prince of
Thieves. In reality, they both would have cut their wieners off if they
tried to swing those suckers in a real battle. At least that’s what a
cosplaying medieval warrior nerd told me. Waterworld
had a stunt show at Seaworld for 25 years. How has Prince of Thieves
not had a stunt show? Heck, I’ll bet you could repurpose an old
Medieval Times restaurant as a Robin Hood Prince of Thieves dinner show
and make a fortune. This Line is the first round of fundraising. I am
not a professional investment advisor. Alan
Rickman is so awesome in this movie that I’ll bet Maid Marian was kinda
hoping Robin didn’t show up to “rescue” her from her wedding. The
end of this movie is insane and amazing. Christian Slater drops an
f-bomb. Rickman turns it up to 14 in a complete tour de force. Two
hours of foreshadowing the amazing battle skills of Morgan Freeman’s
Azeem totally pays off when he fights a 95-year-old homeless lady
(sorry, unhoused lady), almost loses, but finally throws his giant
sword into her. Costner finally realizes he’s in a comedy, but a little
too late. We have a good priest fight a bad priest, finally blurring
the clearly defined characterizations of good and evil. Typical English
proto-Protestantism. And
then, the greatest cameo in film history. Sean Connery swoops in to
c-block Robin Hood, but surprise he’s just being cool. That’s the
Nottingham way, and that’s how you get Robin Hood. Further
evidence of this movie’s greatness is that it got the full Mel Brooks
treatment in “Men In Tights.” Next week, a 3,500 word essay on why that
is Mel’s most underappreciated classic. It
seems to be generally accepted that Waterworld is Costner’s best movie,
but I think there can be no doubt that Prince of Thieves is his Citizen
Kane and his Pieta. Final
word goes to Alan Rickman. You could disagree with everything in this
long commentary (you would be wrong), but nobody can deny that this is
Rickman’s finest contribution to human culture. Ranking Rickman’s
greatest bad guy roles:
George (the Sheriff’s name is George), Robin Hood Prince of Thieves Hans Gruber, Die Hard Marston, Quigley Down Under Harry, Love Actually Secretly Harry Potter’s real dad, Harry Potter Movies
There
you have it. Is “Robin Hood: Prince of Thieves” a good movie? Yes, it
is objectively amazing. It’s the 2000 Northwestern Wildcats of movies.
Definitively in my all time top 10, and should be in yours also.
Oh,
is this year’s Northwestern football team good? Sure. They’re 4-2 and
favored over Purdue. Pause the game during your bathroom time.
Pick: It’s Willie, Prince of Wildcats! NU 34, Purdue 24. NU wins and covers. Season to date: 5-1 ATS, 3-3 SU
The Lowes Line is an
e-mailed description of NU's
next
football game, with an invariably fearless prediction of the outcome
and
how NU will fare against what the other "experts" predict. Our
good
friend and Brother Marcus Lowes began the broadcast mailing in 1996.
The crack Lowes Line Staff (alumni Lone Star Cat,
GallopingGrapes, P.S. O'Briant, Eric Cockerill, Joel Kanvik, Charlie Simon, and
MO'Cats) have continued the Line in memory of Marcus.
For
the 2025 season it has returned to HailToPurple.com,
for anyone to enjoy. Thanks to the gridiron brain trust at the Lowes
Line!

|
|
|